The market in 2025 is no longer behaving like it did in previous cycles. There have been many changes over the past months.

Founders can no longer rely on speed, paid marketing, or surface-level traction to build a stable community and infrastructure.

The teams winning today are the ones who understand market construction just as deeply as they understand product development.

Running a token can no longer compensate for unclear fundamentals. Since exchanges and market makers look more closely at data. Otherwise, users care more about utility than ever. And institutional partners expect a level of operational discipline that would have been unthinkable a few years ago.

For founders preparing to launch tokens, raise capital, or scale their ecosystems, the game has changed.

1. Your users must exist before your token does

One of the most common mistakes founders still make is assuming the token will bring in the users. In past cycles, that assumption occasionally worked because markets rewarded speed, excitement, and drive. A token launch served as a distribution engine, attracting users motivated by incentives rather than utility. In 2026, that model no longer works. Users, investors, and exchanges now examine metrics more closely, and activity that lacks substance is quickly filtered out.

Strong pre-token adoption plans are no longer optional. Founders need evidence that the product is being used meaningfully before they introduce a token. Early cohorts should already be interacting with the product in a way that demonstrates genuine interest rather than campaign-driven participation. This means collecting real feedback, understanding how users behave without incentives, and monitoring whether the product retains attention beyond the initial interaction.

Teams that treat their earliest users as collaborators instead of prospects build deeper, more informed communities. Early users help shape the product, identify gaps, and validate whether the core experience is strong enough to withstand competition or market volatility. When this groundwork is built, a token launch becomes an accelerator rather than a substitute for adoption. It amplifies existing demand rather than creating it.

A token should come from an established product, not be the tool that tries to create one. That distinction is what separates the launches that remain stable from those that collapse shortly after listing.

2. Liquidity is part of the product, not a post-launch task

Founders often underestimate how complex it is to maintain a healthy market once a token begins trading. After launch, the token is public, and market structure shapes the project's credibility. Depth, spreads, execution quality and cross-exchange matter far more than most teams expect.

When liquidity is not planned across these environments, markets develop structural weaknesses such as:

• Wide or unstable spreads
• Shallow depth at best bid and best ask
• Price gaps between your exchanges

These issues may seem small at first, but they become major problems during market volatility. Recently, with the BTC crash, many projects were liquidated because they weren’t ready for the bear market to affect us all to this extent. Showing us to be more careful in our tokenomics as part of our operations. When such conditions hit us again, projects must be prepared for treasuries that can sustain long-term bear markets, or else their users will lose trust due to large slippages, failed executions, or prices differing greatly across listed exchanges, as part of the cause-and-effect of poor preparations.

Tokens rarely collapse because their business models are weak; rather, they break down under bearish conditions.

A professional market maker is key to preventing these situations. Finding the right partner would lead to good, stable spreads, balanced inventory, synced prices across exchanges, hedged exposure, and execution quality even during large flows or macro events.

Founders should choose market makers who provide:

• Transparent reporting in formal documentation
• Real-time liquidity metrics with clear dashboards
• Clear capital usage and KPIs
• Regular performance reviews

Without transparency, teams discover problems only when instability becomes visible to the community (which means it's already too late).

Hence, a reliable liquidity partner would protect the project from small inefficiencies becoming long-term market problems and strengthen the credibility of the entire ecosystem.

3. In 2025, transparency outperforms storytelling

Storytelling remains important, but the market has become far less tolerant of ambiguity. Investors and users now expect clarity from founders, and not just optimistic projections. Founders who communicate with data, context, and consistent updates build far more trust than teams that rely on broad promises or pretty pitch decks. Clear communication is no longer just a marketing choice; it is now essential for any team managing a public asset.

Transparency today involves showing what is actively being built, not what might exist in the future. It means publishing real analytics, sharing progress with measurable outcomes, and explaining key decisions instead of relying on polished narratives. Markets respond better to honest reporting than to overproduced announcements, and teams that make their operations visible tend to earn stronger long-term credibility.

A project that communicates openly can maintain stability even when the market is volatile, whereas one that holds back information often faces disproportionate pressure, as seen in lots of accounts on CT these days. Teams that operate with full transparency have consistently outperformed teams that rely on paid ads, KOLs, and airdrop campaigns, because trust compounds when projects show up as a team through real work and progress - rather than incentivized campaigns designed to keep the community hungry for unlocks and free money.

4. Regulation reshapes distribution, and founders must plan for all

No matter where a token is launched, the regulatory frameworks shape who can participate, how the asset is classified, and which exchanges can support each listing. MiCA in Europe, ETF-driven structures in the U.S., and tightening rules across Asia are all pushing founders toward clearer token models, stronger reporting, and cleaner operational setups. Teams must treat regulation as a prerequisite before launching products or tokens - to avoid many of the structural issues that snowball into disappointed communities and early price dumps.

The strongest projects now design tokenomics that avoid ambiguous classifications, build market plans that align with regional guidelines, and structure treasuries that can withstand audits.

And regulation has shifted from being a hurdle to becoming a competitive advantage. Teams that prepare early are not only safer, they also gain access to better distribution channels, more credible partners, and deeper institutional participation.Despite being the boring part of business, legality has consistently been the biggest catalyst for project decline or growth in the long run, especially as more institutions are pouring into the crypto space these days. We are expecting to see more regulators follow suit alongside institutional entries and add in their rules to ensure the game best benefits all (or themselves?). So, it's best to be ready before the big players settle into the market.

5. Build sustainable ecosystems

Airdrops, points, and incentive programs can create big spikes, but they rarely translate into loyal communities, as mentioned earlier in the article. Most projects that rely on constant rewards end up depleting their treasuries early, attracting participants who disappear as soon as the incentives slow. The result is a cycle of temporary growth followed by sharp drop-offs, leaving teams struggling to convert campaign participants into real, retained users. This, however, differs per project as some are solely aimed at targeting degens and quick traders. Especially ones built as memecoins, replicating existing projects like $BONK or $PEPE (or even creating their own unique versions). However, we’d still advise thinking long term, as profits that last years would, most obviously, beat short-term gains.

Founders need systems that move value through genuine usage rather than subsidies. That comes from real network activity, partnerships, integrations, and ecosystem growth that genuinely enhance the product’s utility and build healthy revenue models tied directly to the token’s purpose. The current market rewards sustainability over quick campaigns. These kinds of campaigns should only be used to build momentum on existing foundations and not be relied on for long-term growth.

Takeaways for Founders

The environment founders are building in is more competitive and more mature, but also more rewarding for those who treat their token as infrastructure rather than a marketing tool. We should implement ideologies from our Web2 builders that truly build to help their communities and prioritize profit as a secondary focus, as we’ve seen with other major companies that solve bigger problems in the market.

In 2025, a stable token economy requires strong products, an active user base, careful liquidity planning, genuine transparency, and clear regulatory compliance. These are no longer nice-to-haves but essential to building a real business.

Thanks for reading.

‍